Against Logicist Cognitive Science

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Dynamic inference and everyday conditional reasoning in the new paradigm (2013, background): “However, the arguments that we and others have put forward for why the psychology of human reasoning must address non-monotonicity (Evans, 2002; Oaksford & Chater, 1991, 2007) vitiate this claim.”
How bad is incoherence (2016, background): “Some psychologists have slowly come around to acknowledging Wundt’s insight (Evans, 2002; Oaksford & Chater, 1991).”
Does Linguistic Communication Rest on Inference (2002, background): “cognitive activity’ ( Oaksford and Chater, 1991: 10 ).”
The conditional in mental probability logic (2010, background): “In the early nineties of the last century, Chater and Oaksford introduced probabilistic models to the field of deductive reasoning [40, 41, 11, 43, 42].”
Fast, frugal, and rational: How rational norms explain behavior (2003, unknown): “1) (Fig.1 - removed)”