Dynamic inference and everyday conditional reasoning in the new paradigm
By Mike Oaksford, N. Chater. 2013
97 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7862233c4cd2afb36bdfba99f5ab072e503e765c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Jean Baratgin
- David E. Over
- Mike Oaksford
- Nicole Cruz
- Jonathan Evans
- Philip N. Johnson-Laird
- N. Chater
- Guy Politzer
In History and Philosophy of Science
In Philosophy
Citations in the corpus
- Logic, probability, and human reasoning. (2015, unknown): “These arguments motivated the turn to probability – a pivot that its proponents refer to as the ‘new paradigm’ [25–29].”
- Bayesian reasoning with ifs and ands and ors (2015, background): “However, we predicted greater coherence when people are explicitly asked for their degrees of belief about p and p or q .”