Functional markers in plants.

By J. R. Andersen, T. Lübberstedt. Trends in Plant Science, 2003

793 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Genetics, Molecular Biology, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/01f2bfc38c187e92402130f2cbf88e8f5e80469d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

1. A. Graner
2. A. Singh
3. B. Singh
4. R. Aggarwal
5. Rajeev K. Varshney
6. D. Mackill
7. B. Barritt
8. Yanmin Zhu

In Molecular Biology

1. Y. El-Kassaby
2. C. Lata
3. S. Sawant
4. A. Ranjan
5. A. Graner
6. R. Aggarwal
7. Hemant Kumar Yadav
8. D. Viands

In Plant Science

1. R. Aggarwal
2. A. Graner
3. Rajeev K. Varshney
4. D. Mackill
5. A. Singh
6. B. Singh
7. B. Collard
8. B. Barritt

Citations in the corpus

• Dreb1 genes in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): development of functional markers and gene mapping based on SNPs (2008, background): “Such markers are completely correlated with gene function (Andersen and Lübberstedt 2003), irrespective of the complex chromosome structure.”
• Comparative assessment of EST-SSR, EST-SNP and AFLP markers for evaluation of genetic diversity and conservation of genetic resources using wild, cultivated and elite barleys (2007, positive): “In recent years, with increasing efforts to develop EST (expressed sequence tag) resources for crop plants including barley, a new class of locusspecific DNA markers called ‘functional molecular markers’ have been developed [10].”
• Conserved DNA-Derived Polymorphism (CDDP): A Simple and Novel Method for Generating DNA Markers in Plants (2009, background): “on gene regions which may have advantages over random markers for applications in QTL mapping (Andersen and Lubberstedt 2003).”
• Recent Molecular and Genomic Studies on Stress Tolerance of Forage and Turf Grasses (2006, background): “Single nucleotide polymorphism markers developed from candidate genes could actually result in functional markers, that is, marker alleles that actually are the cause of phenotypic differences (Andersen and Lubberstedt, 2003).”
• Md-ACS1 and Md-ACO1 genotyping of apple (Malus x domestica Borkh.) breeding parents and suitability for marker-assisted selection (2008, methodology): “Markers used in this study for ACS1 and ACO1 belong to the emerging category of molecular markers termed “functional” or “perfect markers”, which are derived from sequence variation of functionally analyzed genes (Andersen and Lübberstedt 2003; Varshney et al. 2005).”
• Linkage disequilibrium and association studies in higher plants: Present status and future prospects (2005, background): “For this purpose, LD will also facilitate development of functional markers (FMs), which are the perfect markers for marker-trait association (see Andersen and Lu¨bberstedt, 2003; Gupta and Rustgi, 2004; Simko et al., 2004b).”
• Marker-Assisted Plant Breeding: Principles and Practices (2015, background): “Molecular markers have been used to construct high-density linkage maps and for the detection of QTLs and their mapping to specific genomic regions.”
• Linkage disequilibrium, genetic association mapping and gene localization in crop plants (2008, background): “For this purpose, LD will also facilitate development of functional markers (FMs), which are the perfect markers for marker-trait association (see Andersen and Lübberstedt, 2003; Gupta et al., 2005; Simko et al. 2004).”
• Discovery of a new fragrance allele and the development of functional markers for the breeding of fragrant rice varieties (2008, background): “The ideal markers would be the so-called functional markers developed from functional domain(s) within the target gene as these would provide an absolute differentiation between phenotypes (Andersen and Luebberstedt 2003).”
• EST-derived SSR markers in Jatropha curcas L.: development, characterization, polymorphism, and transferability across the species/genera (2011, background): “Recent trends in marker technology favor the development of functional markers instead of anonymous markers ( Anderson and Lubberstedt 2003 ) since they can be used to assess the functional diversity in the populations and may prove more powerful for marker-assisted breeding (MAB).The EST-derived SS”