Comparative assessment of EST-SSR, EST-SNP and AFLP markers for evaluation of genetic diversity and conservation of genetic resources using wild, cultivated and elite barleys

399 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Comparative Assessment of SSR and AFLP Markers for Evaluation of Genetic Diversity and Conservation of Fig, Ficus carica L., Genetic Resources in Tunisia (2011, methodology): “The QND is the most important measure for the genebank curators and managers as they like to have genotyping data for their material that can be documented and handled easily in their database as well as can be communicated in terms of ‘molecular passport data’ among different genebanks across the g”
Applicability of start codon targeted (SCoT) and inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers for genetic diversity analysis in durum wheat genotypes (2016, background): “[13] as the product of PIC and effective multiplex ratio.”
A Rice Diversity Panel Evaluated for Genetic and Agro‐Morphological Diversity between Subpopulations and its Geographic Distribution (2011, background): “The high level of allelic diversity in SSR markers facilitates detection of the fine structure of diversity more efficiently than an equal number of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP, or SNP loci (Powell et al., 1996; Lorz and Wendel, 2005; Varshney et al., 2007).”