The Effects of Open Space on Residential Property Values
By Elena G. Irwin. Land Economics, 2002
752 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/01ad0e858ed912d19aca6e99a6956e529028ab79
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Stephen Polasky
- D. Lewis
- E. Nelson
- S. Garcia
- J. Abildtrup
- Heather A. Sander
- Mark D. Rounsevell
- Jackson Loomis
Citations in the corpus
- An Empirical Examination of the Timing of Land Conversions in the Presence of Farmland Preservation Programs (2008, methodology): “In contrast, duration models are better able to analyze the timing of the development decision and are increasingly being applied in the land use context (e.g., Nickerson 2000; Irwin 2002; Irwin and Bockstael 2001; Hite, Sohngen, and Templeton 2003).”
- CONSERVING SPECIES IN A WORKING LANDSCAPE: LAND USE WITH BIOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC OBJECTIVES (2005, background): “…positive externalities include a premium for housing values for adjacency to biological reserves or open space (e.g., Tyrvainen and Miettinen 2000, Irwin 2002, Thorsnes 2002, Vossler et al. 2003) and the effect of pollinators on crop yields (e.g., Nabhan and Buchmann 1997, Allen-Wardell et al.…”
- Valuation of ecosystem services from rural landscapes using agricultural land prices (2011, background): “Surroundings have been widely explored in residential property value studies (Geoghegan et al., 1997; Irwin, 2002; Johnston et al., 2001; Lake and Easter, 2002; Ready and Abdalla, 2005; Secchi, 2007).”
- Landscape amenities and local development: a review of migration, regional economic and hedonic pricing studies (2010, background): “The variables were specified as percentage of a neighborhood area or within a certain radius around the property (Bockstael, 1996; Hardie et al., 2007; Irwin, 2002; Paterson and Boyle, 2002; Kuminoff, 2009), as zone or adjacency dummy (Johnston et al.”
- Open Space, Residential Property Values, and Spatial Context (2006, background): “…address this issue by measuring the total quantity of open space surrounding a home within a given distance (Cheshire and Sheppard, 1995; Irwin and Bockstael, 2001; Irwin, 2002; Geoghegan, 2002) or at multiple scales (Acharya and Bennett, 2001; Geoghegan et al., 1997; Geoghegan et al., 2003).”
- Hedonic Price Effects of Pedestrian- and Transit-Oriented Development (2011, background): “Increasing the percentage of open space land surrounding a property tends to increase average house prices between 0 and 1 percent of the total property Bartholomew and Ewing 25 value (Acharya and Bennett 2001; Geoghegan, Lynch, and Bucholtz 2003; Irwin 2002).”
- Spatial configurations in a periurban city. A cellular automata-based microeconomic model (2007, background): “Using information about the legal status of land, Irwin (2002) showed that available private land has a negative influence on the price of neighbouring houses.”
- How Does a New Sports Stadium Affect Housing Values? The Case of FedEx Field (2005, background): “…Dehring and Lash (2000) investigate the impact of group homes on neighborhood property values; Carroll, Clauretie and Jensen (1996) study the effects of neighborhood churches on residential property values; and Irwin (2002) examines the influence of open space on residential housing values.”
- Valuing open space in a residential sorting model of the Twin Cities (2010, background): “Examples of this include Irwin and Bockstael (2001), Irwin (2002), Smith, et al. (2002), and Andersen and West (2006), where the latter also examines open space in the Twin Cities.”
- Place value: place quality and its impact on health, social, economic and environmental outcomes (2018, background): “(2016a) Well-being and urban form Well-connected and easily accessible, characterized by green areas and predominance of historic properties, a dense street network, grid-shaped High levels of well-being, walking, sociability, less pollution and stress, feelings of safety and better eating habits gi”
- The Introduction of Price Signals into Land Use Planning Decision-making: A Proposal (2004, neutral): “Moreover given existing research such as that summarised in Table 5 or Irwin (2002) on the value of intensively farmed agricultural land it does not seem likely that any credible methodology would give estimates of value in current use for such land remotely approaching its value for housing.”
- The Impact Of Stadium Announcements On Residential Property Values: Evidence From A Natural Experiment In Dallas‐Fort Worth (2007, positive): “…(1964), Lansford and Jones (1995) Darling (1973), Brown and Pollakowski (1977), Cassel and Mendelson (1985)], the effect of public open space externalities on house prices [Correll et al (1978), Dehring and Dunse (2006), Epsey and Owusu-Edusei (2001), Irwin (2002), and Weicher and Zerbst (1973)].”
- Do Repeated Wildfires Change Homebuyers’ Demand for Homes in High-Risk Areas? A Hedonic Analysis of the Short and Long-Term Effects of Repeated Wildfires on House Prices in Southern California (2009, methodology): “The hedonic property method is commonly used to model housing markets, and is often used to measure the value of environmental amenities or disamenities proximate to the home, including: open space, ( Irwin 2002 ), water quality (Leggett and Bockstael 2000), nuclear waste transport (Gawande and Jenk”
- A sight for sore eyes: Assessing the value of view and land use in the housing market (2011, positive): “In addition to distance, type and size, open space value may also depend on its status and ownership (on this topic, see Geoghegan 2002; Irwin 2002).”
- An Embarrassment of Riches: Confronting Omitted Variable Bias and Multi-Scale Capitalization in Hedonic Price Models (2011, background): “…employing coarse spatial fixed effects include air quality (Zabel & Kiel, 2000; Beron, Murdoch, & Thayer, 2001), earthquake risk (Beron et al., 1997), open space (Irwin, 2002), nuclear waste transport (Gawande & Jenkins-Smith, 2001), and urban forest amenities (Tyrvainen & Miettinen, 2000).”