Cultural intelligence, personality, and cross-cultural adjustment: A study of expatriates in Japan

By Kyle C. Huff, Pingping Song, Eric B. Gresch. 2014

185 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0175d07c8de5c458cbe49c207387fcd43daad269

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. Ilaria Setti
2. V. Sommovigo
3. P. Argentero
4. Alfred Presbitero

In Social Psychology

1. Ilaria Setti
2. V. Sommovigo
3. P. Argentero
4. Alfred Presbitero

Citations in the corpus

• Cultural intelligence (CQ) in virtual, cross-cultural interactions: Generalizability of measure and links to personality dimensions and task performance (2016, background): “Third, most research on CQ focuses on outcomes such as cultural judgment, decision-making and cross-cultural adjustments (e.g., Ang et al., 2007; GuÐmundsdóttir, 2015; Huff et al., 2014; Lin et al., 2012).”
• Measuring cultural intelligence (CQ) (2015, unknown): “Second,many validation studies fail to report tests of discriminant validity between the four-dimensional structure of the CQS, despite the moderately high to high intercorrelations across dimensions (Chen et al., 2011, 2012;ElenkovandManev, 2009;Engle andCrowne, 2014;Engle andNehrt, 2012;Engle et a”
• Enhancing expatriates’ assignments success: the relationships between cultural intelligence, cross-cultural adaptation and performance (2020, result): “Whereas some studies have revealed that behavioural CQ was non-significantly (e.g., Huff et al. 2014; Konanahalli et al. 2014) or negatively (e.g., Guðmundsdóttir 2015; Malek and Budhwar 2013) related to work CCA, other investigations have found a positive association between the two constructs…”