A survey and review of approaches to study transitions
By Daniël A. Lachman. 2013
219 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0142c03f1d1940ec22cb1a22dc7909d110cebe48
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Global and Planetary Change
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Citations in the corpus
- Transition heuristic frameworks in research on agro-food sustainability transitions (2020, background): “2010; Lachman 2013; Markard et al.”
- The Multi-Level Perspective in Research on Sustainability Transitions in Agriculture and Food Systems: A Systematic Review (2019, background): “The socio-technical landscape cannot be changed easily in the short run [28,36,37] and includes exogenous events and trends such as demographic changes, macro-economic trends, political developments, wars and crises, deep cultural and societal values, and climate change [22].”
- Deep transitions: Emergence, acceleration, stabilization and directionality (2018, unknown): “Additional criticism included the tendency towards technological determinism and a lack of agency (see Geels, 2005a: 68–72; Köhler, 2012; Lachman, 2013, for summaries of these arguments).”
- Agri-Food Markets towards Sustainable Patterns (2020, methodology): “Different frameworks have been used in transition studies [158].”
- Transforming Consumption: From Decoupling, to Behavior Change, to System Changes for Sustainable Consumption (2015, background): “Research and practice should focus on developing, testing, and analyzing multiple transition pathways (126, 149, 160), identifying and developing strategies for adaptive collaborations while taking into account competing interests (149), and more effectively invoking”