Validity, Reliability, and Invariance of the Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS) Across Diverse Physical Activity Contexts

111 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Attitudes toward and motivation for PE. Who collects the benefits of the subject? (2015, methodology): “motivation on many accounts (factor validity, internal consistency, and multigroup invariance), and in many physical activity contexts (Standage et al. 2003).”
Motivation, overtraining, and burnout: Can self-determined motivation predict overtraining and burnout in elite athletes? (2007, methodology): “Consistent with self-determination theory (Grolnick & Ryan, 1987 ) and previous research that has used a SDI in the context of sport (Lemyre et al , 2006 ; Standage et al , 2003 ), the correlations between the subscales generally conformed to a quasi-simplex pattern of relationships for the nin”
Effects of choice on student motivation and physical activity behavior in physical education. (2008, methodology): “The dependent variables will be represented in four subscale scores derived from the 14-item 51 SIMS (Guay et al., 2000; Standage et al., 2003).”
Self-determination in physical education: designing class environments to promote active lifestyles (2007, methodology): “Reliability and construct validity has been demonstrated consistently for the SIMS in previous research studies (Standage et al., 2003).”