Institutional change in varieties of capitalism

By P. Hall, Kathleen Thelen. 2008

815 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Finance, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0029901b40979fd809ee3f2f7f33af4accaf2297

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Finance

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

Varieties of institutional systems: A contextual taxonomy of understudied countries (2016, background): “…been classified by Hall and Soskice (2001) and subsequent lit NBS, and the CME encompasses various subtypes of collaborative systems included in ** These economies are often classified as unique subtypes of collaborative systems whe (Schneider, 2013; Hall & Thelen, 2009; Grosvold & Brammer, 2011).”
Varieties of Capitalism and institutional comparative advantage: A test and reinterpretation (2016, background): “2On the notion of institutions as resources more generally, see also Hall and Thelen (2009) and Jackson and Deeg (2008).”
Introduction: Understanding integrated policy strategies and their evolution (2009, background): “The rules of the new policy game were often unfamiliar or improvised and gave rise to considerable institutional ambiguity, ‘‘in which the ‘rules’ conventionally associated with an institution are reinterpreted, often informally, to accommodate new diversities in the interests of the actors associat”
Mapping the business systems of 61 major economies: A taxonomy and implications for varieties of capitalism and business systems research (2018, positive): “Most of the works on these topics so far have drawn on the Varieties of Capitalism framework and, in doing so, have adopted the underlying logic of complementarity residing in coherent strategic or market coordination across institutional dimensions (e.g. Hall and Soskice, 2001; Taylor, 2004; Kenwor”
A Common Neoliberal Trajectory (2011, background): “From within the VoC approach has come a renewed emphasis on institutional experimentation, a more political interpretation of the process of institutional reproduction, and greater space for actors to reassess their interests and contemplate institutional change.(21) It is also worth noting that eve”
A Neorealist Approach to Institutional Change and the Diversity of Capitalism (2008, background): “See, for instance, Kindermann (2005) versus Hall and Soskice (2001) on the issue of the change/”
Deep transitions: Emergence, acceleration, stabilization and directionality (2018, neutral): “For example, Hansen and Coenen (2015) have stressed the role of varieties of capitalism (Hall and Soskice, 2001; Hall and Thelen, 2009) in shaping transition dynamics in a specific territory.”
Institutional change in economic geography (2014, background): “Hall and Thelen (2009) provide several illustrative examples of such ‘shifts from below’, where incremental changes in patterns of economic interaction generate new demands regarding the general institutional field.”
Economic causes of the Eurozone crisis: the analytical contribution of Comparative Capitalism (2016, background): “…with a background in historical and sociological institutionalism (e.g. Yamamura and Streeck, 2001; Schmidt, 2002; Amable, 2003, 2008; Jackson and Deeg, 2006; Hassel, 2006, 2014; Hancké et al., 2007; Becker, 2009; Hall and Thelen, 2009; McCann, 2010; Crouch, 2012; Schneider, 2013; Thelen, 2014).”
Institutional Thickness Revisited (2017, background): “Gertler (2010) suggests adapting theoretical advancements made in historical institutionalism (more concretely, the work done by Hall and Thelen (2009) and Mahoney and Thelen (2010) to the regional analysis of institutions.”
E Pluribus Unum? Varieties and Commonalities of Capitalism (2010, neutral): “See below.”
From Typology to Taxonomy: A Configurational Analysis of National Business Systems and their Explanatory Power (2014, background): “The apparent continuity of the relative differences among the clusters may therefore conceal the fact that some institutions have taken on new functions or have come to serve different purposes (see e.g., Deeg & Jackson, 2007; Goyer, 2003; Hall & Thelen, 2009).”