Global burden of depressive disorders in the year 2000
By Tevfik Bedirhan Üstün, J. Ayuso-Mateos, S. Chatterji, Colin D Mathers, C. Murray. British Journal of Psychiatry, 2004
1,739 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Pharmacology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/00133b61c66684098bf66605121ad38300c9a79e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- Ronald C. Kessler
- David R. Williams
- N. Sampson
- Derek Richards
- E. Bromet
- Peter Fonagy
- R. Nesse
- I. Hwang
In Pharmacology
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Prevalence and distribution of major depressive disorder in African Americans, Caribbean blacks, and non-Hispanic whites: results from the National Survey of American Life. (2007, background): “Worldwide, it is the fourth leading cause of disability and the leading cause of nonfatal disease burden, accounting for almost 12% of total years lived with disability.(6) In the United States, the economic burden of depression was estimated to be $83 billion in 2000.”
- Cross-national epidemiology of DSM-IV major depressive episode (2011, background): “Major depression is a serious, recurrent disorder linked to diminished role functioning and quality of life, medical morbidity, and mortality [1,2].”
- Prevalence and clinical course of depression: a review. (2011, methodology): “As well as a high prevalence in women, duration is often longer for females than for males (Ayuso-Mateos et al., 2001; Bebbington et al., 1998; Üstün et al., 2004).”
- The development of a brief psychodynamic protocol for depression: Dynamic Interpersonal Therapy (DIT) (2010, background): “It interferes with social and occupational functioning, it is associated with considerable morbidity and carries a significant risk of mortality through suicide (Ustun, Ayuso-Mateos, Chatterji, Mathers, & Murray, 2004 ).”
- The economic burden of adults with major depressive disorder in the United States (2005 and 2010). (2015, methodology): “Direct costs were estimated according to employment and MDD treatment status: (1) employed and treated—costs estimated from claims data; (2) employed and not treated— MDD costs set equal to 0, and non-MDD costs (the second and third cost categories above) set equal to those incurred by employed and ”
- Global variation in the prevalence and incidence of major depressive disorder: a systematic review of the epidemiological literature (2012, background): “The GBD 2000 update predicted an average incidence of 3.2% in males and 4.9% in females (Ayuso-Mateos, 2000 ; Üstün et al. 2004), which was higher than our results of 2.7% in males and 3.4% in females.”