Sarah Necker

Safety Research · 2014

A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 1 researcher and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Sarah Necker trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Daniele Fanelli
  2. Donald B. Rubin

Who trusts Sarah Necker overall

  1. Tomáš Havránek
  2. Cameron Hepburn

Papers from Sarah Necker's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Sarah Necker trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (PLoS ONE)
  2. Scientists behaving badly (Nature)
  3. The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results
  4. The Logic of Scientific Discovery.
  5. HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known
  6. Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
  7. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. (Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA))
  8. Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of heterogeneity (Statistics in Medicine)
  9. What is a systematic review?
  10. The Logic of Scientific Discovery

Their papers