N. Heerink

Soil Science · 2001–2018

A researcher in the Science corpus: 12 papers; trusts 10 researchers and is trusted by 12 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Soil Science — 49 citations into it; #1,700 of 2,166 by trust here, #641 by citations
• General Agricultural and Biological Sciences — 38 citations into it; #843 of 1,453 by trust here, #204 by citations
• Economics and Econometrics — 30 citations into it; #10,645 of 23,481 by trust here, #6,031 by citations
• Political Science and International Relations — 23 citations into it; #3,856 of 4,701 by trust here, #1,688 by citations
• Pollution — 20 citations into it; #723 of 1,888 by trust here, #908 by citations
• Gender Studies — 16 citations into it
• Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment — 15 citations into it; #2,274 of 5,212 by trust here, #3,803 by citations
• Urban Studies — 14 citations into it

Whom N. Heerink trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Guanghua Wan
2. Jean‐Louis van Gelder
3. R. Heltberg
4. Hanan G. Jacoby
5. G. Spaargaren
6. Jeffrey M. Wooldridge
7. K. Deininger
8. S. Sherlund
9. Awudu Abdulai
10. Hui Wang

Who trusts N. Heerink overall

1. Lutz Sager
2. Michael Hübler
3. Nicole Grunewald
4. K. Kawasaki
5. George Emm. Halkos
6. Soumyananda Dinda
7. Christophe Muller
8. S. Démurger
9. Robert M. Ewers
10. Andrew K. Jorgenson

Papers from N. Heerink's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers N. Heerink trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Technical Efficiency and Its Determinants in China's Grain Production
2. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data
3. From Linear Fuel Switching to Multiple Cooking Strategies: A Critique and Alternative to the Energy Ladder Model
4. Land Tenure Security and Investment Incentives: Puzzling Evidence from Burkina Faso
5. Fuel switching: evidence from eight developing countries
6. Do farmers benefit from participating in specialty markets and cooperatives? The case of coffee marketing in Costa Rica1
7. Factors determining household fuel choice in Guatemala (Environment and Development Economics)
8. Transactions Costs and Agricultural Household Supply Response
9. To reallocate or not: Reconsidering the dilemma in China's agricultural land tenure policy
10. Fuel choices in urban Indian households (Environment and Development Economics)

Their papers

• Income inequality and the environment: aggregation bias in environmental Kuznets curves (2001) — 399 citations
• Ethiopian Agricultural Cooperatives in an Era of Global Commodity Exchange: Does Organisational Form Matter? (2011) — 219 citations
• Energy consumption practices of rural households in north China: Basic characteristics and potential for low carbon development (2013) — 141 citations
• Cooperative membership and farmers’ choice of marketing channels – Evidence from apple farmers in Shaanxi and Shandong Provinces, China (2018) — 149 citations
• Farmland tenure in China: Comparing legal, actual and perceived security (2015) — 159 citations
• Identifying entry points to improve fertilizer use efficiency in Taihu Basin, China (2014) — 129 citations
• Land tenure security and land investments in Northwest China (2013) — 114 citations
• China's One-Child Policy and the Mystery of Missing Women: Ethnic Minorities and Male-Biased Sex Ratios (2011) — 98 citations
• Impact of land fragmentation on rice producers’ technical efficiency in South-East China (2010) — 228 citations
• Land rental market, off-farm employment and agricultural production in Southeast China: A plot-level case study (2010) — 179 citations
• Do fragmented landholdings have higher production costs? Evidence from rice farmers in Northeastern Jiangxi province, P.R. China (2008) — 165 citations
• Energy consumption in rural China: A household model for three villages in Jiangxi Province (2006) — 217 citations