Do fragmented landholdings have higher production costs? Evidence from rice farmers in Northeastern Jiangxi province, P.R. China
By Shuhao Tan, N. Heerink, G. Kruseman, F. Qu. 2008
165 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Political Science and International Relations, Soil Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/717eb1693c7577255be6b22e468ccd002616c5e3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
In Political Science and International Relations
In Soil Science
Citations in the corpus
- Cooperative membership and farmers’ choice of marketing channels – Evidence from apple farmers in Shaanxi and Shandong Provinces, China (2018, background): “However, the reform also resulted in land fragmentation and small-scale agriculture, which have become an obstacle to develop modern agriculture (Tan et al., 2008).”
- The costs and benefits of land fragmentation of rice farms in Japan (2010, methodology): “The cost-function approach is desirable to measure fragmentation costs appropriately; however, studies using the cost-function approach (Jabarin and Epplin 1994; Ali et al. 1996; Tan 2005; Tan et al. 2008) have not analyzed the beneficial effects.”
- Assessing the impacts of land fragmentation and plot size on yields and costs: A translog production model and cost function approach (2018, background): “They can also affect productivity, decrease overall grain production capability, and simultaneously increase input costs (Haji, 2007; Latruffe and Piet, 2014; Rahman and Rahman, 2008; Sklenicka et al., 2014; Tan et al., 2008).”