Anna-Bettina Haidich

Statistics and Probability · 2001–2010

A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 7 researchers and is trusted by 1 researcher here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Anna-Bettina Haidich trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Julian P. T. Higgins
  2. Douglas G. Altman
  3. J. Deeks
  4. Peter Jüni
  5. Thomas Lumley
  6. P. Lachenbruch
  7. J. Sterne
  8. Matthias Egger

Who trusts Anna-Bettina Haidich overall

  1. Georg Eichler
  2. Erich J. Schwarz
  3. Blakeley B. McShane
  4. R. Slavin

Papers from Anna-Bettina Haidich's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Anna-Bettina Haidich trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. (New England Journal of Medicine)
  2. Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable? (The Lancet)
  3. A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials (American journal of ophthalmology-glaucoma)
  4. Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (PLoS ONE)
  5. How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGS
  6. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Supplements for Primary and Secondary Prevention: Mortality in Randomized Trials of Antioxidant
  7. Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta‐regression (Statistics in Medicine)
  8. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (Statistics in Medicine)
  9. CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (British medical journal)
  10. Observational studies analyzed like randomized experiments: an application to postmenopausal hormone therapy and coronary heart disease (Epidemiology)

Their papers