Natascha de Hoog

Applied Psychology · 2007–2008

A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 5 researchers and is trusted by 3 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Natascha de Hoog trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. L. Hedges
  2. Mark Lipsey
  3. Xiao-Hua Zhou
  4. Sarah Milne
  5. Terri D. Pigott
  6. Linda Cameron
  7. Lauren G. Block
  8. Nancy A. Obuchowski
  9. P. Sheeran
  10. C. G. Lord

Who trusts Natascha de Hoog overall

  1. Gjalt-Jorn Ygram Peters
  2. Robert A. C. Ruiter
  3. Melanie B. Tannenbaum
  4. Jonathan van ’t Riet
  5. Allen C. Johnston
  6. Wolfgang Stroebe
  7. L. Pelletier

Papers from Natascha de Hoog's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Natascha de Hoog trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Statistical Methods for Meta‐Analysis
  2. A meta-analysis of research on protection motivation theory.
  3. The power of statistical tests in meta-analysis. (Psychological methods)
  4. Practical Meta-Analysis
  5. Prediction and Intervention in Health-Related Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Review of Protection Motivation Theory
  6. Social Psychology and Health
  7. Undoing the Effects of Seizing and Freezing: Decreasing Defensive Processing of Personally Relevant Messages
  8. A Meta-Analysis of Fear Appeals: Implications for Effective Public Health Campaigns (Health Education & Behavior)
  9. The self-regulation of health and illness behaviour.
  10. The Impact of Vulnerability to and Severity of a Health Risk on Processing and Acceptance of Fear-Arousing Communications: A Meta-Analysis

Their papers