C. A. Langford

General Health Professions · 2017

A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 2 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom C. A. Langford trusts

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. H. Arksey (in General Health Professions)
  2. L. O’Malley (in General Health Professions)

Papers from C. A. Langford's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers C. A. Langford trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework
  2. Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework (BMC Medical Research Methodology)
  3. Synthesising research evidence.
  4. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research
  5. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. (Health Information and Libraries Journal)
  6. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (Implementation science : IS)
  7. What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature. (International Journal of Nursing Studies)
  8. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews (International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare)
  9. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews (BMC Medical Research Methodology)
  10. A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency (Research Synthesis Methods)

Their papers