L. Evarts

2014

A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 4 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Whom L. Evarts trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Julian P. T. Higgins
  2. A. Liberati

Papers from L. Evarts's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers L. Evarts trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (British medical journal)
  2. Sex and gender, 2nd ed.
  3. The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (British medical journal)
  4. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Supplements for Primary and Secondary Prevention: Mortality in Randomized Trials of Antioxidant
  5. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (Statistics in Medicine)
  6. Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta‐regression (Statistics in Medicine)
  7. How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGS
  8. Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (PLoS ONE)
  9. Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy. (The Lancet)
  10. Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (Medical Journal of Australia)

Their papers