Joseph C. Cappelleri
Statistics and Probability · 2002–2018
A researcher in the Science corpus: 4 papers; trusts 4 researchers and is trusted by 7 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Statistics and Probability — 34 citations into it; #5,020 of 12,932 by trust here, #2,407 by citations
- Economics and Econometrics — 10 citations into it; #22,761 of 23,481 by trust here, #14,505 by citations
Whom Joseph C. Cappelleri trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
Who trusts Joseph C. Cappelleri overall
- Marley W. Watkins
- G. Consortium
- E. Knekta
- Hudson F. Golino
- Jordan W. Smoller
- Christopher Runyon
- Brian French
- Dingjing Shi
- Sarah L. Eddy
Papers from Joseph C. Cappelleri's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers Joseph C. Cappelleri trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses (British medical journal)
- Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit
- Advanced methods in meta‐analysis: multivariate approach and meta‐regression (Statistics in Medicine)
- Indirect comparisons of competing interventions. (Health Technology Assessment)
- Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: combining direct and indirect evidence (British medical journal)
- How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGS
- Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons (Statistics in Medicine)
- Assessing Evidence Inconsistency in Mixed Treatment Comparisons
- Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis (Statistics in Medicine)
- Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 1. (Value in Health)
Their papers
- Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 1. (2011) — 1,027 citations
- Conducting indirect-treatment-comparison and network-meta-analysis studies: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 2. (2011) — 751 citations
- Exploratory Factor Analysis (2018) — 1,904 citations
- The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): a state-of-the-science review (2002) — 1,030 citations