U. Mager
Education · 2012
A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 2 researchers and is trusted by 2 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Education — 9 citations into it; #6,940 of 11,309 by trust here, #11,030 by citations
- General Health Professions — 7 citations into it
- Sociology and Political Science — 6 citations into it; #14,216 of 22,756 by trust here, #22,355 by citations
- Statistics and Probability — 6 citations into it
Whom U. Mager trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
Who trusts U. Mager overall
Papers from U. Mager's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers U. Mager trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Weight of Evidence: a framework for the appraisal of the quality and relevance of evidence
- From hearing voices to engaging in dialogue: problematising student participation in school improvement
- Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review. (Social Science & Medicine (1967))
- Evidence-based Policy: A Realist Perspective
- Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. (International Journal of Surgery)
- Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. (The Lancet)
- Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta‐analysis in Context
- Quality in qualitative evaluation: A framework for assessing research evidence. A quality framework.
- Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (Medical Journal of Australia)
- Dichotomizing continuous predictors in multiple regression: a bad idea (Statistics in Medicine)