A. Kruess

Nature and Landscape Conservation · 2002–2007

A researcher in the Science corpus: 10 papers; trusts 11 researchers and is trusted by 47 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Nature and Landscape Conservation — 43 citations into it; #857 of 6,941 by trust here, #364 by citations
• Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics — 42 citations into it; #231 of 6,648 by trust here, #188 by citations
• Ecology — 32 citations into it; #4,375 of 10,717 by trust here, #3,102 by citations
• Insect Science — 29 citations into it; #144 of 2,259 by trust here, #455 by citations
• Ecological Modeling — 7 citations into it

Whom A. Kruess trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Martin Schmidt
2. B. Ekbom
3. O. Balmer
4. T. Tscharntke
5. Y. Clough
6. I. Steffan‐Dewenter
7. M. WallisDeVries
8. J. Bengtsson
9. Andreas Erhardt

Who trusts A. Kruess overall

1. T. Tscharntke
2. Johann G. Zaller
3. J. Pöyry
4. S. DeBano
5. P. Batáry
6. Y. Clough
7. Van Nouhuys
8. B. Dumont
9. D. Kleijn
10. M. Samways

Papers from A. Kruess's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers A. Kruess trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture. (Annual Review of Entomology)
2. SCALE‐DEPENDENT EFFECTS OF LANDSCAPE CONTEXT ON THREE POLLINATOR GUILDS
3. Are communities saturated? On the relationship between α, β and γ diversity
4. CONTRIBUTION OF SMALL HABITAT FRAGMENTS TO CONSERVATION OF INSECT COMMUNITIES OF GRASSLAND–CROPLAND LANDSCAPES
5. The role of perennial habitats for Central European farmland spiders
6. Agri-environment schemes do not effectively protect biodiversity in Dutch agricultural landscapes (Nature)
7. Can generalist predators be effective biocontrol agents? (Annual Review of Entomology)
8. Effects of agricultural diversification on the abundance, distribution, and pest control potential of spiders: a review
9. Diversity of flower-visiting bees in cereal fields: effects of farming system, landscape composition and regional context
10. Linking agricultural practice to insect and bird populations: a historical study over three decades

Their papers

• Organic versus conventional arable farming systems: Functional grouping helps understand staphylinid response (2007) — 107 citations
• Alpha and beta diversity of arthropods and plants in organically and conventionally managed wheat fields (2007) — 199 citations
• Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries. (2006) — 1,093 citations
• Local and landscape factors in differently managed arable fields affect the insect herbivore community of a non‐crop plant species (2006) — 96 citations
• Spider diversity in cereal fields: comparing factors at local, landscape and regional scales (2005) — 251 citations
• Effects of landscape structure and habitat type on a plant-herbivore-parasitoid community (2003) — 171 citations
• Characteristics of insect populations on habitat fragments: A mini review (2002) — 488 citations
• Grazing Intensity and the Diversity of Grasshoppers, Butterflies, and Trap‐Nesting Bees and Wasps (2002) — 432 citations
• Contrasting responses of plant and insect diversity to variation in grazing intensity (2002) — 397 citations
• CONTRIBUTION OF SMALL HABITAT FRAGMENTS TO CONSERVATION OF INSECT COMMUNITIES OF GRASSLAND–CROPLAND LANDSCAPES (2002) — 551 citations