Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture.
By D. Landis, S. Wratten, G. Gurr. Annual Review of Entomology, 2000
3,063 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/572d2e3b3df1a67cd74687b1e515de88148a3cf3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Insect Science
Citations in the corpus
- Suggestions for unifying the terminology in biological control (2001, background): “These practices are highly successful and are among the few documented uptakes of a biological control option in temperate open-field arable agriculture ( Landis et al., 2000 ).”
- Effects of flower attractiveness and nectar availability in field margins on biological control by parasitoids (2008, background): “this has translated into an increasing interest in the use of (flowering) non-crop plants as a tool to sustain biological control (Bugg and Waddington, 1994; Wratten and van Emden, 1995; Landis et al., 2000; Gurr et al., 2005).”
- Fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) management by smallholders. (2019, background): “Plant diversity has also been shown to increase FAW natural enemy populations harbouring and increasing the activity of natural enemies [56, 57].”
- A quantitative review of relationships between ecosystem services (2014, background): “In order to compensate the loss of habitat in agricultural areas, more sustainable farming managements were often suggested (Altieri, 1999; Landis et al., 2000; Altieri, 2004; Lichtfouse et al., 2009) such as organic farming, which promises to increase ES nursery and habitat protection.”
- The role of perennial habitats for Central European farmland spiders (2005, background): “As farmland spiders are very mobile and potentially switch between habitat types, interactions between different habitat types may affect spider population dynamics on a landscape scale (Halley et al., 1996; Wissinger, 1997; Topping, 1999; Landis et al., 2000; Samu et al., 1999; Sunderland and Samu,”
- Pollination reservoirs for wild bee habitat enhancement in cropping systems: a review (2017, background): “The benefits of wildflower plantings for natural enemies of crop pests, for example, are already well documented (Landis, Wratten, and Gurr 2000) and it is likely that PRs would enhance populations of a diversity of beneficial insects and non-insect arthropods (Schmidt-Entling and Döbeli 2009) and…”
- Genetically engineered crops help support conservation biological control (2019, background): “One involves habitat manipulations to increase the abundance and activity of natural enemies (Landis et al., 2000), because natural enemies have been shown to benefit from increased landscape complexity (Bianchi et al.”
- Current status and potential of conservation biological control for agriculture in the developing world (2013, background): “They provide important resources for natural enemies such as refuge sites, alternative prey, pollen and nectar (e.g., Landis et al., 2000; Cronin and Reeve, 2005; Bianchi et al., 2006).”
- Biological Control of Insect Pests in Agroecosystems: Effects of Crop Management, Farming Systems, and Seminatural Habitats at the Landscape Scale: A Review (2010, background): “Woody habitats often provide a more moderate microclimate than the center of fields, protecting natural enemies against extreme temperature variations (Landis et al., 2000; Rahim et al., 1991).”
- Using selective food plants to maximize biological control of vineyard pests (2006, background): “Research in a variety of agro-ecosystems has shown that many adult parasitoids use nectar and/or pollen as a food and this is an important consideration for biological control ( Landis, Wratten & Gurr 2000; Lee & Heimpel 2004; Heimpel & Jervis 2005).”