M. Stoltenborgh

Clinical Psychology · 2011–2015

A researcher in the Science corpus: 3 papers; trusts 2 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom M. Stoltenborgh trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Richard L. Tweedie
  2. Mark Lipsey
  3. Juliette D. G. Goldman
  4. Noemí Pereda
  5. S. de Sanjosé
  6. C. Widom
  7. M. Bakermans‐Kranenburg
  8. Georgina Guilera
  9. D. Glaser
  10. Marinus H. van IJzendoorn

Who trusts M. Stoltenborgh overall

  1. Sylvie Parent
  2. M. Li

Papers from M. Stoltenborgh's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers M. Stoltenborgh trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Worldwide prevalence and genotype distribution of cervical human papillomavirus DNA in women with normal cytology: a meta-analysis. (Lancet. Infectious Diseases (Print))
  2. A Nonparametric “Trim and Fill” Method of Accounting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis
  3. Emotional abuse and neglect (psychological maltreatment): a conceptual framework. (International Journal of Child Abuse & Neglect)
  4. Validity of adult retrospective reports of adverse childhood experiences: review of the evidence. (Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines)
  5. Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (Biometrics)
  6. The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results
  7. Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta‐regression (Statistics in Medicine)
  8. Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated (Epidemiology)
  9. The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey (Canadian Medical Association Journal)
  10. Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy. (The Lancet)

Their papers