John Danesh

Management Science and Operations Research · 2000–2023

A researcher in the Science corpus: 59 papers; trusts 1 researcher and is trusted by 14 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom John Danesh trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Julian P. T. Higgins
  2. P. Ridker
  3. S. Thompson

Who trusts John Danesh overall

  1. P. Ridker
  2. Peter Libby
  3. I. Graham
  4. S. Fazel
  5. Y. Chida
  6. G. Hansson
  7. Ramachandran S. Vasan
  8. Børge G. Nordestgaard
  9. Massimo F. Piepoli
  10. Anna C. Belkina

Papers from John Danesh's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers John Danesh trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Plasma concentration of interleukin-6 and the risk of future myocardial infarction among apparently healthy men. (Circulation)
  2. Markers of inflammation and cardiovascular disease: application to clinical and public health practice: A statement for healthcare professionals from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention… (Circulation)
  3. Mendelian randomization: prospects, potentials, and limitations. (International Journal of Epidemiology)
  4. Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. (Health Technology Assessment)
  5. Reprint: 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol to Reduce Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk in Adults. (Journal of the American Pharmacists Association)
  6. Homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: new insights and guidance for clinicians to improve detection and clinical management. A position paper from the Consensus Panel on Familial… (European Heart Journal)
  7. HMG-coenzyme A reductase inhibition, type 2 diabetes, and bodyweight: evidence from genetic analysis and randomised trials (The Lancet)
  8. Statin safety: a systematic review. (American Journal of Cardiology)
  9. The safety of statins in clinical practice. (The Lancet)
  10. Bias and causal associations in observational research.

Their papers