L. Enos

Statistics in Medicine · 2000–2002

A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 2 researchers and is trusted by 4 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Whom L. Enos trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. David Moher

Who trusts L. Enos overall

  1. Kosuke Imai
  2. Jared C. Foster

Papers from L. Enos's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers L. Enos trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Testing for baseline balance in clinical trials.
  2. Subgroup analysis and other (mis)uses of baseline data in clinical trials.
  3. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (Annals of Internal Medicine)
  4. How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGS
  5. CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (British medical journal)
  6. Is Volume Related to Outcome in Health Care? A Systematic Review and Methodologic Critique of the Literature (Annals of Internal Medicine)
  7. Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. (The Lancet)
  8. Statistical considerations in the intent-to-treat principle. (Controlled Clinical Trials)
  9. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (Annals of Internal Medicine)
  10. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. (New England Journal of Medicine)

Their papers