Dean Langan

Statistics and Probability · 2015–2018

A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 6 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Dean Langan trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. W. Viechtbauer
  2. Andrew L. Rukhin
  3. Kurex Sidik
  4. R. Dersimonian
  5. Evangelos Kontopantelis
  6. Jeffrey N. Jonkman
  7. Raghu N. Kacker
  8. A. Sutton

Who trusts Dean Langan overall

  1. S. McGrath

Papers from Dean Langan's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Dean Langan trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: an update. (Contemporary Clinical Trials)
  2. A simple confidence interval for meta‐analysis (Statistics in Medicine)
  3. What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta-analysis of sparse data. (Statistics in Medicine)
  4. Parametric Empirical Bayes Inference: Theory and Applications
  5. The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method (BMC Medical Research Methodology)
  6. Simple heterogeneity variance estimation for meta‐analysis
  7. How does the DerSimonian and Laird procedure for random effects meta-analysis compare with its more efficient but harder to compute counterparts?
  8. Improved tests for a random effects meta‐regression with a single covariate (Statistics in Medicine)
  9. How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGS
  10. Estimating heterogeneity variance in meta‐analysis

Their papers