Gerta Rücker

Statistics and Probability · 2005–2023

A researcher in the Science corpus: 12 papers; trusts 12 researchers and is trusted by 24 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Gerta Rücker trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Julian P. T. Higgins
  2. Georgia Salanti
  3. Ivan Gutman
  4. S. Dias
  5. A. Ades
  6. S. Green
  7. N. Welton
  8. Ian R. White
  9. John P. A. Ioannidis
  10. D. Caldwell

Who trusts Gerta Rücker overall

  1. U. Krahn
  2. S. Balduzzi
  3. S. Shim
  4. O. Efthimiou
  5. John B. O. Mitchell
  6. Harald Binder
  7. Seong-Jang Kim
  8. Pedro J. Ballester
  9. Adriani Nikolakopoulou
  10. T. Debray

Papers from Gerta Rücker's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Gerta Rücker trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis (Statistics in Medicine)
  2. Assessing Evidence Inconsistency in Mixed Treatment Comparisons
  3. Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta‐regression (Statistics in Medicine)
  4. Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: concepts and models for multi-arm studies (Research Synthesis Methods)
  5. Evaluation of networks of randomized trials (Statistical Methods in Medical Research)
  6. How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGS
  7. Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (PLoS ONE)
  8. Advanced methods in meta‐analysis: multivariate approach and meta‐regression (Statistics in Medicine)
  9. The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey (Canadian Medical Association Journal)
  10. How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study. (Health Technology Assessment)

Their papers