Danielle Richer

Statistics and Probability · 2014

A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 8 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Danielle Richer trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. A. Ades
  2. Guobing Lu
  3. Thomas Lumley
  4. W. Viechtbauer
  5. S. Dias
  6. Georgia Salanti
  7. Julian P. T. Higgins
  8. U. Krahn
  9. David J. Spiegelhalter
  10. Andrea Cipriani

Papers from Danielle Richer's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Danielle Richer trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis (Statistics in Medicine)
  2. Assessing Evidence Inconsistency in Mixed Treatment Comparisons
  3. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit
  4. Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: concepts and models for multi-arm studies (Research Synthesis Methods)
  5. Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 2 (Medical decision making)
  6. Incident diabetes in clinical trials of antihypertensive drugs: a network meta-analysis. (The Lancet)
  7. General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations
  8. Indirect and mixed‐treatment comparison, network, or multiple‐treatments meta‐analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool (Research Synthesis Methods)
  9. Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package
  10. Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons (Statistics in Medicine)

Their papers