Andrea Cipriani

Statistics and Probability · 2006–2020

A researcher in the Science corpus: 11 papers; trusts 6 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Andrea Cipriani trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Julian P. T. Higgins
  2. Georgia Salanti
  3. S. Thompson
  4. J. Deeks
  5. A. Ades
  6. Thomas Lumley
  7. Guobing Lu
  8. Douglas G. Altman

Who trusts Andrea Cipriani overall

  1. Georgia Salanti
  2. B. Neupane
  3. A. Chaimani
  4. U. Krahn
  5. G. van Valkenhoef
  6. Danielle Richer
  7. Christoph U. Correll

Papers from Andrea Cipriani's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Andrea Cipriani trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta‐regression (Statistics in Medicine)
  2. Assessing Evidence Inconsistency in Mixed Treatment Comparisons
  3. Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis (Statistics in Medicine)
  4. Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 1. (Value in Health)
  5. How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? (Statistics in Medicine)
  6. The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews (Systematic Reviews)
  7. Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: combining direct and indirect evidence (British medical journal)
  8. Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons (Statistics in Medicine)
  9. Issues in the selection of a summary statistic for meta‐analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes (Statistics in Medicine)
  10. Indirect and mixed‐treatment comparison, network, or multiple‐treatments meta‐analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool (Research Synthesis Methods)

Their papers