James J. Schlesselman

Statistics and Probability · 2007

A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 2 researchers and is trusted by 1 researcher here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom James J. Schlesselman trusts

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. M. Garton (in Genetics)
  2. Douglas G. Altman (in Statistics and Probability)

Who trusts James J. Schlesselman

  1. S. Cuschieri (in Statistics and Probability)

Papers from James J. Schlesselman's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers James J. Schlesselman trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Dichotomizing continuous predictors in multiple regression: a bad idea (Statistics in Medicine)
  2. The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (Annals of Internal Medicine)
  3. Evidence b(i)ased medicine—selective reporting from studies sponsored by pharmaceutical industry: review of studies in new drug applications (British medical journal)
  4. [The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies]. (Revista Española de Salud Pública)
  5. Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (PLoS ONE)
  6. Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. (The Lancet)
  7. Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (Medical Journal of Australia)
  8. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Supplements for Primary and Secondary Prevention: Mortality in Randomized Trials of Antioxidant
  9. Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals. (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews)
  10. On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. (Psychological methods)

Their papers