C. Tomasi

Statistics and Probability · with Derks · 2015–2018

A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 8 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom C. Tomasi trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. E. von Elm
  2. Douglas G. Altman
  3. Jan P. Vandenbroucke
  4. Matthias Egger
  5. Byron C. Wallace
  6. A. Liberati
  7. Stuart J. Pocock
  8. P. Gøtzsche

Papers from C. Tomasi's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers C. Tomasi trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (British medical journal)
  2. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. (Bulletin of the World Health Organization)
  3. Closing the Gap between Methodologists and End-Users: R as a Computational Back-End
  4. Peri-implant diseases: Consensus Report of the Sixth European Workshop on Periodontology. (Journal of Clinical Periodontology)
  5. The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (British medical journal)
  6. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. (Preventive Medicine)
  7. Nine- to fourteen-year follow-up of implant treatment. Part II: presence of peri-implant lesions. (Journal of Clinical Periodontology)
  8. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (Annals of Internal Medicine [serial online])
  9. Definition and prevalence of peri-implant diseases. (Journal of Clinical Periodontology)
  10. Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (Medical Journal of Australia)

Their papers