Aurélien Baillon

General Decision Sciences · 2011–2018

A researcher in the Science corpus: 3 papers; trusts 7 researchers and is trusted by 2 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• General Decision Sciences — 40 citations into it; #1,639 of 1,995 by trust here, #982 by citations
• Economics and Econometrics — 32 citations into it; #20,086 of 23,481 by trust here, #12,103 by citations
• Management Science and Operations Research — 23 citations into it
• Safety Research — 16 citations into it
• Artificial Intelligence — 7 citations into it; #31,004 of 35,345 by trust here, #20,377 by citations

Whom Aurélien Baillon trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Amos Tversky
2. Peter P. Wakker
3. Mohammed Abdellaoui
4. Daniel Kahneman
5. Alain Chateauneuf
6. Laure Cabantous
7. Richard Gonzalez
8. Lætitia Placido
9. Syngjoo Choi
10. Ralph Hertwig

Who trusts Aurélien Baillon overall

1. Russell Golman

Papers from Aurélien Baillon's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Aurélien Baillon trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. On the shape of the probability weighting function.
2. AMBIGUITY AND SECOND-ORDER BELIEF
3. Experimental practices in economics: A methodological challenge for psychologists? (Behavioral and Brain Sciences)
4. Consistency and heterogeneity of individual behavior under uncertainty
5. Choice-Based Elicitation and Decomposition of Decision Weights for Gains and Losses Under Uncertainty (Management Sciences)
6. Prospect Theory: Frontmatter
7. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty
8. Estimating Ambiguity Aversion in a Portfolio Choice Experiment
9. The Rich Domain of Uncertainty: Source Functions and Their Experimental Implementation
10. Making Low Probabilities Useful

Their papers

• The Rich Domain of Uncertainty: Source Functions and Their Experimental Implementation (2011) — 559 citations
• Measuring Ambiguity Attitudes for All (Natural) Events (2018) — 115 citations
• Aggregating imprecise or conflicting beliefs: An experimental investigation using modern ambiguity theories (2012) — 60 citations