Karen Rodham

Clinical Psychology · 2002–2015

A researcher in the Science corpus: 4 papers; trusts 3 researchers and is trusted by 4 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Karen Rodham trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Rachel L. Shaw
  2. J. Brocki
  3. Jonathan A. Smith
  4. Alison Wearden
  5. Lucy Yardley
  6. Roni Berger
  7. K. L. Gratz
  8. E. Klonsky
  9. Matthew K. Nock

Who trusts Karen Rodham overall

  1. Kate H Bentley
  2. J. Chin
  3. Matthew K. Nock
  4. E. Klonsky
  5. David H. Barlow

Papers from Karen Rodham's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Karen Rodham trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Reflecting on the development of interpretative phenomenological analysis and its contribution to qualitative research in psychology
  2. Embedding Reflexivity Within Experiential Qualitative Psychology
  3. Interpretative phenomenological analysis
  4. Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: quality and the idea of qualitative research. (Journal of Advanced Nursing)
  5. Demonstrating validity in qualitative psychology
  6. A critical evaluation of the use of interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) in health psychology
  7. Descriptive Versus Interpretive Phenomenology: Their Contributions to Nursing Knowledge (Qualitative Health Research)
  8. Now I see it, now I don’t: researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research
  9. Exploring lived experience
  10. Experiences of Addiction and Recovery: the Case for Subjective Accounts

Their papers