Experiences of Addiction and Recovery: the Case for Subjective Accounts

128 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Lost in the game: Narratives of addiction and identity in recovery from problem gambling (2012, background): “…and McKeganey (2000) described addicts’ accounts of recovery as a process of identity reformation or of reconstructing a spoiled identity, while Larkin and Griffiths (2002) drew attention to the importance of understanding subjective notions such as self-concept, self-esteem and personal…”
A critical evaluation of the use of interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) in health psychology (2006, methodology): “Larkin and Griffiths (2002) used IPA to analyse observational notes.”
Alcohol and the self: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the experience of addiction and its impact on the sense of self and identity (2009, background): “(e.g. Biernacki 1986; Kellogg 1993; Larkin and Griffiths 2002; McIntosh and McKeganey 2000, 2001).”
Assessing Internet Addiction Using the Parsimonious Internet Addiction Components Model—A Preliminary Study (2013, background): “With regards to (i) and (ii), the subjective experience of symptoms appears to be an important indicator of psychopathology because individuals are the best judge of the extent to which their addiction impacts upon their life (Larkin and Griffiths 2002).”