G. Dijkstra
Social Indicators Research · 2005–2018
A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 1 researcher and is trusted by 3 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Whom G. Dijkstra trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
Who trusts G. Dijkstra overall
Papers from G. Dijkstra's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers G. Dijkstra trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (British medical journal)
- Combining sanitation and women's participation in water supply: an example from Rajasthan
- CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration (PLoS Medicine)
- Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons (Statistics in Medicine)
- Initial Severity and Antidepressant Benefits: A Meta-Analysis of Data Submitted to the Food and Drug Administration (PLoS Medicine)
- An exploratory test for an excess of significant findings (Clinical Trials)
- Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (Medical Journal of Australia)
- Fracture prevention with vitamin D supplementation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. (Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA))
- GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations (British medical journal)
- Addressing Reporting Biases