Matti Maltamo

Nature and Landscape Conservation · 2000–2017

A researcher in the Science corpus: 24 papers; trusts 50 researchers and is trusted by 48 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Matti Maltamo trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Erik Næsset
  2. Annika S. Kangas
  3. Jari Vauhkonen
  4. Johan Holmgren
  5. Petteri Packalen
  6. J. Kalliovirta
  7. Terje Gobakken
  8. Tron Eid
  9. Robert Martin Haralick
  10. Tomas Brandtberg

Who trusts Matti Maltamo overall

  1. Erik Næsset
  2. Jouni Siipilehto
  3. Ole Martin Bollandsås
  4. Petteri Packalen
  5. Annika S. Kangas
  6. Jari Vauhkonen
  7. Terje Gobakken
  8. Lauri Mehtätalo
  9. Ruben Valbuena
  10. Hooman Latifi

Papers from Matti Maltamo's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Matti Maltamo trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Estimation of timber volume and stem density based on scanning laser altimetry and expected tree size distribution functions
  2. Random Forests
  3. Imputation of single-tree attributes using airborne laser scanning-based height, intensity, and alpha shape metrics
  4. DEM Generation from Laser Scanner Data Using Adaptive TIN Models
  5. Functions for estimating stem diameter and tree age using tree height, crown width and existing stand database information
  6. 3D segmentation of single trees exploiting full waveform LIDAR data
  7. Effects of pulse density on predicting characteristics of individual trees of Scandinavian commercial species using alpha shape metrics based on airborne laser scanning data
  8. Comparison of percentile based prediction methods and the Weibull distribution in describing the diameter distribution of heterogeneous Scots pine stands
  9. Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning laser using a practical two-stage procedure and field data
  10. The single tree-based stand simulator SILVA: construction, application and evaluation

Their papers