Non-parametric prediction of diameter distributions using airborne laser scanner data
By Matti Maltamo, Erik Næsset, Ole Martin Bollandsås, Terje Gobakken, Petteri Packalen. 2009
64 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/33353952ab70988b31a9e097f3a72095ad26efe0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Environmental Engineering
- Matti Maltamo
- Jari Vauhkonen
- Petteri Packalen
- Johan Holmgren
- Erik Næsset
- Håkan Olsson
- Juho Pitkänen
- Barbara Koch
In Insect Science
- Jari Vauhkonen
- Matti Maltamo
- Petteri Packalen
- Johan Holmgren
- Barbara Koch
- Hooman Latifi
- Juho Pitkänen
- Håkan Olsson
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Matti Maltamo
- Petteri Packalen
- Jari Vauhkonen
- Erik Næsset
- Johan Holmgren
- Håkan Olsson
- Juho Pitkänen
- Ruben Valbuena
Citations in the corpus
- Evaluation of most similar neighbour and random forest methods for imputing forest inventory variables using data from target and auxiliary stands (2012, methodology): “This allows one to capture those properties of the individual strata that are unique to each individual stratum, as previously suggested by Maltamo et al. (2009).”
- Prediction of Stem Attributes by Combining Airborne Laser Scanning and Measurements from Harvesters (2012, methodology): “Stem diameter distributions have been estimated using Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) with field data from inventories of sample plots as reference data (Gobakken and Næsset 2004, Maltamo et al. 2009).”
- Comparison of airborne laser scanning methods for estimating forest structure indicators based on Lorenz curves (2014, methodology): “…that would leave insufficient degrees of freedom for canonical correlation analysis, it was used for imputation stage while the components themselves where computed with y = (GC, LA, QMD), as these can suffice to obtain accurate predictions of diameter distributions (Maltamo et al., 2009).”