Naomi Altman
Statistics and Probability · Nature Methods · 2015–2017
A researcher in the Science corpus: 10 papers; trusts 1 researcher and is trusted by 10 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Statistics and Probability — 6 citations into it; #9,259 of 12,932 by trust here, #4,809 by citations
Whom Naomi Altman trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
Who trusts Naomi Altman overall
- Vadim O. Sokolov
- Santo Fortunato
- Yifeng Li
- Emil Björnson
- Giovanni Interdonato
- Martin Krzywinski
- Jiayi Zhang
- Darko Hric
- Jahna Otterbacher
- Martin J. Wainwright
Papers from Naomi Altman's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers Naomi Altman trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships
- Points of Significance: Classification and regression trees
- Circular genome visualization and exploration using CGView (Bioinform.)
- Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs.
- Clonal Integration of a Polyomavirus in Human Merkel Cell Carcinoma
- Metabolomics by numbers: acquiring and understanding global metabolite data. (Trends in Biotechnology)
- Guest editorial. Computational systems biology. (IET Systems Biology)
- A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality
- Modularity and community structure in networks.
- The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. (Science)
Their papers
- Points of Significance: Clustering (2017) — 1,892 citations
- Points of Significance: Classification evaluation (2016) — 288 citations
- Points of Significance: Logistic regression (2016) — 1,952 citations
- Points of Significance: Interpreting P values (2017) — 74 citations
- Principal component analysis (2017) — 840 citations
- Points of significance: P values and the search for significance (2016) — 111 citations
- Points of Significance: Association, correlation and causation (2015) — 310 citations
- Points of Significance: Split plot design (2015) — 56 citations
- Points of Significance: Multiple linear regression (2015) — 470 citations
- Points of Significance: Simple linear regression (2015) — 156 citations