T. Philip
2018
A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 1 researcher and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Whom T. Philip trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
Papers from T. Philip's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers T. Philip trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- R: A language and environment for statistical computing.
- Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package
- Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta‐regression (Statistics in Medicine)
- Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales.
- How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGS
- How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? (Statistics in Medicine)
- Predicting the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analysis, using empirical data from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (International Journal of Epidemiology)
- Prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical models (comment on article by Browne and Draper)
- Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: an update. (Contemporary Clinical Trials)
- Statistical Methods for Meta‐Analysis
Their papers
- The religious correlates of death anxiety: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2018) — 120 citations