Andrew Kirby
Publ. · 2023
A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 8 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Whom Andrew Kirby trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
- Alberto Mart'in-Mart'in
- Nees Jan van Eck
- Mike Thelwall
- Ludo Waltman
- Dominique Valentin
- Carmel McNaught
- Enrique Orduña-Malea
- Ming Tang
- Emilio Delgado López-Cózar
Papers from Andrew Kirby's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers Andrew Kirby trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (Scientometrics)
- Visualizing Bibliometric Networks
- A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: Multidimensional scaling and VOS (J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol.)
- Invited review Quick and dirty but still pretty good: a review of new descriptive methods in food science
- Using Wordle as a Supplementary Research Tool
- Ten Years of Sustainability (2009 to 2018): A Bibliometric Overview
- Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol.)
- Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science (Biomedical Digital Libraries)
- R: A language and environment for statistical computing.
- ggplot2 - Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (2nd Edition)
Their papers
- Exploratory Bibliometrics: Using VOSviewer as a Preliminary Research Tool (2023) — 341 citations