Daniel Peterson

Molecular Biology · with Kumar · 2011–2013

A researcher in the Science corpus: 3 papers; trusts 9 researchers and is trusted by 10 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Daniel Peterson trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Sudhir Kumar
  2. Ardavan F. Oskooi
  3. Alexandros Stamatakis
  4. Koichiro Tamura
  5. Michael P. Cummings
  6. Stéphane Guindon
  7. Joseph Felsenstein
  8. Robert C. Edgar
  9. S. Blair Hedges
  10. David Posada

Who trusts Daniel Peterson overall

  1. Koichiro Tamura
  2. Sudhir Kumar
  3. Glen Stecher
  4. Erica T. Cline
  5. A. Yassin
  6. Marco Loog
  7. Asha J. Dissanayake
  8. Stelios Katsanevakis
  9. T. Shiozaki
  10. J. Zahniser

Papers from Daniel Peterson's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Daniel Peterson trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. (Systematic Biology)
  2. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0.
  3. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach (Journal of Molecular Evolution)
  4. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models
  5. MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity
  6. RAxML-III: a fast program for maximum likelihood-based inference of large phylogenetic trees (Bioinform.)
  7. Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages of akaike information criterion and bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. (Systematic Biology)
  8. Estimating the Dimension of a Model
  9. Incomplete taxon sampling is not a problem for phylogenetic inference (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America)
  10. Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics

Their papers