Elizabeth Murray

General Health Professions · Implementation science : IS · 2005–2017

A researcher in the Science corpus: 6 papers; trusts 2 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Elizabeth Murray trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Albert Boonstra
  2. Manda Broekhuis

Who trusts Elizabeth Murray overall

  1. J. V. van Gemert-Pijnen

Papers from Elizabeth Murray's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Elizabeth Murray trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies. (Health Technology Assessment)
  2. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (British medical journal)
  3. Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ (BMC Medical Research Methodology)
  4. Systematic Review of Factors Influencing the Adoption of Information and Communication Technologies by Healthcare Professionals (Journal of medical systems)
  5. Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions (BMC Health Services Research)
  6. Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory (Implementation science : IS)
  7. Comparison of user groups' perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic health records: a systematic review (BMC Medicine)
  8. Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions (BMC Medical Research Methodology)
  9. Personal health records: a scoping review (J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc.)
  10. Factors that promote or inhibit the implementation of e-health systems: an explanatory systematic review. (Bulletin of the World Health Organization)

Their papers