Ann Hallyburton

2014

A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 4 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Whom Ann Hallyburton trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Julian P. T. Higgins
  2. A. Liberati
  3. Douglas G. Altman
  4. S. Thompson
  5. J. Archer
  6. J. Deeks

Papers from Ann Hallyburton's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Ann Hallyburton trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (British medical journal)
  2. Sex and gender, 2nd ed.
  3. The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (British medical journal)
  4. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Supplements for Primary and Secondary Prevention: Mortality in Randomized Trials of Antioxidant
  5. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (Statistics in Medicine)
  6. Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta‐regression (Statistics in Medicine)
  7. How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGS
  8. Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (PLoS ONE)
  9. Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (Medical Journal of Australia)
  10. Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons (Statistics in Medicine)

Their papers