Tania B. Huedo-Medina
Statistics and Probability · 2006–2008
A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 3 researchers and is trusted by 13 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Statistics and Probability — 12 citations into it; #4,634 of 12,932 by trust here, #741 by citations
Whom Tania B. Huedo-Medina trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
Who trusts Tania B. Huedo-Medina overall
- Sumedha Chauhan
- Holly Wilson
- Guillermo Marcillo
- William S. Bush
- F. Leichsenring
- Hannah J. P. Klug
- Gjalt-Jorn Ygram Peters
- Vasanti S. Malik
- David B. Portnoy
- Weijie Mao
Papers from Tania B. Huedo-Medina's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers Tania B. Huedo-Medina trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Statistical Methods for Meta‐Analysis
- Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.)
- Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (Statistics in Medicine)
- Meta-analysis of correlation coefficients: a Monte Carlo comparison of fixed- and random-effects methods. (Psychological methods)
- The Problems in Using Fixed-Effects Models of Meta-Analysis on Real-World Data
- The power of statistical tests for moderators in meta-analysis. (Psychological methods)
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (British medical journal)
- Fixed Effects vs. Random Effects Meta‐Analysis Models: Implications for Cumulative Research Knowledge
- Evidence b(i)ased medicine—selective reporting from studies sponsored by pharmaceutical industry: review of studies in new drug applications (British medical journal)
- Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research
Their papers
- Initial Severity and Antidepressant Benefits: A Meta-Analysis of Data Submitted to the Food and Drug Administration (2008) — 2,421 citations
- Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index? (2006) — 3,932 citations