David Mataix-Cols
Cognitive Neuroscience · 2004–2017
A researcher in the Science corpus: 9 papers; trusts 5 researchers and is trusted by 13 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Cognitive Neuroscience — 66 citations into it; #3,076 of 10,852 by trust here, #5,291 by citations
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging — 15 citations into it
- Clinical Psychology — 13 citations into it; #1,813 of 8,024 by trust here, #2,546 by citations
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 10 citations into it; #2,534 of 9,731 by trust here, #2,952 by citations
Whom David Mataix-Cols trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
- Joaquim Radua
- E. Foa
- Tor D. Wager
- Peter E. Turkeltaub
- Stephen M. Smith
- Simon B. Eickhoff
- Karl J. Friston
Who trusts David Mataix-Cols overall
- J. Abramowitz
- Joaquim Radua
- H. Hart
- R. Jacoby
- Simon B. Eickhoff
- E. Bora
- Angela R. Laird
- G. Mason
- P. Liénard
Papers from David Mataix-Cols's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers David Mataix-Cols trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Meta-Analysis of the Functional Neuroanatomy of Single-Word Reading: Method and Validation (NeuroImage)
- Neuroimaging studies of shifting attention: a meta-analysis (NeuroImage)
- The problem of functional localization in the human brain (Nature Reviews Neuroscience)
- Imaging Cognition II: An Empirical Review of 275 PET and fMRI Studies (Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience)
- Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America)
- Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm (IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging)
- On the Plurality of (Methodological) Worlds: Estimating the Analytic Flexibility of fMRI Experiments (Frontiers in Neuroscience)
- Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (Nature Reviews Neuroscience)
- False-Positive Psychology (Psychology Science)
- Fast robust automated brain extraction
Their papers
- Ten simple rules for neuroimaging meta-analysis (2017) — 756 citations
- Anisotropic Kernels for Coordinate-Based Meta-Analyses of Neuroimaging Studies (2014) — 394 citations
- The Structured Interview for Hoarding Disorder (SIHD): Development, usage and further validation (2013) — 100 citations
- Meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies of inhibition and attention in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: exploring task-specific, stimulant medication, and age effects. (2013) — 740 citations
- A new meta-analytic method for neuroimaging studies that combines reported peak coordinates and statistical parametric maps (2012) — 749 citations
- Voxel-wise meta-analysis of grey matter changes in obsessive-compulsive disorder. (2009) — 865 citations
- A multidimensional model of obsessive-compulsive disorder. (2005) — 1,032 citations
- Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire-Brief: factor structure and influence of sex and age in a nonclinical population (2005) — 102 citations
- Distinct neural correlates of washing, checking, and hoarding symptom dimensions in obsessive-compulsive disorder. (2004) — 903 citations