Logic, Logic, and Logic
By George Boolos. 2000
310 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ffc700f56e6b550b5c5ae83a2a930fa2571972c0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Jeffrey Lidz
- Paul Pietroski
- Tim Hunter
- Justin Halberda
- Timothy Williamson
- Agustín Rayo
- David J. Chalmers
- Samy Bengio
Citations in the corpus
- The Meaning of ‘Most’: Semantics, Numerosity and Psychology (2009, background): “3 For discussion, see Wright (1983), Boolos (1998), and the essays in Demopolous (1994).”
- The nature of Epistemic Space (2011, background): “I think it is much more straightforward to set aside proper classes, holding (with Boolos 1998, Shapiro 1993, and others) that all collections are sets, and drawing the morals that one would have to draw at the level of collections in any case at the level of sets.”
- A completeness theorem for unrestricted first- order languages (2003, background): “The possibility of quantifying over everything is also defended in Boolos (1998b), McGee (2000), Williamson (1999), Rayo (2003) and Williamson (forthcoming).”
- Interface transparency and the psychosemantics of most (2011, background): “In (1a), it signifies set-subtraction: ‘Y ) X’ is equivalent to ‘{x: (x ̨ Y) & ~(x ̨ X)}’—though, following Boolos (1998), one can eschew the appeal to sets and speak of the ‘Ys minus any Xs’.”