Naturalness judgments by lay Americans: Process dominates content in judgments of food or water acceptability and naturalness

By P. Rozin. Judgment and Decision Making, 2006

129 citations recorded by the source corpus.

This study directly tests the hypothesis that, at least within the domains of food and drink for Americans, the judgment of naturalness has more to do with the history of an object, that is the processes that it has undergone, as opposed to its material content. Individuals rate the naturalness and acceptability of a natural entity (water or tomato paste), that same entity with a first transformation in which a natural substance is added (or some part removed), and then a second transformation in which the natural additive is removed (or the removed part is replaced). The twice transformed entity is stipulated to be identical to the original natural entity, yet it is rated much less natural and less acceptable. It differs from the original entity only in its history (the reversed processes it has experienced). The twice transformed entity is also rated as less natural than the once-transformed entity, even though the former is identical to the original natural entity, and the latter is not. Therefore, naturalness depends heavily on the process-history of an entity.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ff86a8aaa1a1b54e19c00f17e2d0a40a849d6d7e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

  1. J. Aschemann‐Witzel
  2. Paula Varela
  3. R. Vecchio
  4. Tormod Næs
  5. D. Asioli
  6. Azzurra Annunziata
  7. Vincenzina Caputo
  8. Michael Siegrist

In Cognitive Neuroscience

  1. R. Vecchio
  2. Sergio Román
  3. Michael Siegrist

In Sensory Systems

  1. J. Aschemann‐Witzel
  2. Paula Varela
  3. R. Vecchio
  4. Tormod Næs
  5. D. Asioli
  6. Azzurra Annunziata
  7. Vincenzina Caputo
  8. Michael Siegrist

Citations in the corpus