Quality and rigor of the concept mapping methodology: a pooled study analysis.

By Scott R. Rosas, M. Kane. Evaluation and Program Planning, 2012

545 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5645e6f702ade56024596a5aaa4b3c5dbd8b1e7d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. Laura J. Damschroder
2. Byron J. Powell
3. Enola K. Proctor
4. T. Waltz
5. Jeffrey L. Smith
6. Dennis H. Li
7. Justin D. Smith
8. M. Rafferty

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Byron J. Powell
2. Enola K. Proctor
3. Laura J. Damschroder

Citations in the corpus

• Use of concept mapping to characterize relationships among implementation strategies and assess their feasibility and importance: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) study (2015, background): “While concept maps with 30 or more participants are considered to be highly reliable [14], if stakeholders from outside the United States had practice contexts that alter the perceptions of these strategies interrelationships, or the ratings of their perceived importance and feasibility, different r”