Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context

By Nicole Adler, Lea Friedman, Zilla Sinuany-Stern. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002

912 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ff5296c54a8cfc994c4f15c6019f8fb3f9f7b620

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

In Management Science and Operations Research

Citations in the corpus

Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability (2016, background): “The literature presents an array of MCDM methodologies, each with their own characteristics, varying levels of sophistication and diverse scope of application [37-44].”
Olympic ranking based on a zero sum gains DEA model (2003, methodology): “The literature provides methods to overcome this difficulty (Adler et al., 2002).”
Cross-ranking of Decision Making Units in Data Envelopment Analysis (2013, methodology): “Among them are the super-efficiency methods, the multicriteria DEA methods and the cross-efficiency methods [3].”
Estimating most productive scale size with stochastic data in data envelopment analysis (2009, methodology): “See, for example, Andersen and Petersen (1993), Adler et al. (2002), Li et al.”
The debate on flexibility of environmental regulations, innovation capabilities and financial performance : a novel use of DEA (2018, background): “…universities, industry sectors, hospitals, retailers, banks, for deriving weights from pairwise comparison matrices - Ramanathan 2006, for ranking problems - Adler et al. 2002, for multiple-criteria decision making -Joro et al. 1998, new product development - Swink et al. 2006, and many more).”
Selecting symmetric weights as a secondary goal in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation (2011, neutral): “’s [8] results).”
Review of efficiency ranking methods in data envelopment analysis (2017, background): “’s [11] review of the literature on DEA ranking methods, for example, focused on the development of this research stream between 1986 and 2000.”