SAS for Linear Models

By R. Littell, Walter W. Stroup, R. Freund. 2002

595 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ff3aa5ecebfbe535ac9d54badf20de6096ffcce8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Biodiversity, phenology and temporal niche differences between native- and novel exotic-dominated grasslands (2011, methodology): “Experimental response variables were analyzed with mixed model ANOVA using PROC MIXED in SAS Version 9.2 (Littell et al., 2002).”
Thinning intensity and growth response in SW-European Scots pine stands (2008, methodology): “Degrees of freedom were adjusted using the Kenward-Rogers procedure [23].”
Relative importance of family, site, and field placement timing on survival, growth, and yield of hatchery-produced Pacific oyster spat (Crassostrea gigas) (2005, methodology): “The TEST option of the RANDOM statement was used to define the appropriate F-statistics for each model due to nested effects and interaction effects (Littell et al., 2002), and multiple comparison tests were used to determine differences in means by the Tukey method (LSMEANS).”
Effect of feeding Saccharomyces Cerevisiae on performance of dairy cows during summer heat stress (2009, methodology): “Daily values were averaged to weekly means and analyzed by ANOVA as repeated measures (Littell et al., 2002) using the MIXED procedure of SAS (2001) with effects of treatment, week, interaction between treatment and week, and pen within treatment as the random experimental error in the model.”
Comparison of the Allelopathic Potential of Leguminous Summer Cover Crops: Cowpea, Sunn Hemp, and Velvetbean (2007, methodology): “…as a result of the interaction between the cover crop and activated carbon treatments, the simple effects on plant height and dry biomass of smooth amaranth were assessed by comparison of least squares means using the PDIFF option of the general linear models procedure (Littell et al., 2002).”
Diet overlap among two Asian carp and three native fishes in backwater lakes on the Illinois and Mississippi rivers (2009, methodology): “We assumed a negative binomial distribution for this analysis because biological count data can be influenced by overdispersion when assuming a Poisson distribution ( Little et al. 2002 ), and our CPUE data for Asian carp and zooplankton density were distinctly clumped.”
ATTRACTING ANTAGONISTS: DOES FLORAL NECTAR INCREASE LEAF HERBIVORY? (2004, methodology): “We used Duncan’s Multiple Range test (Littell et al. 2002) as a post hoc comparison of oviposition between nectar treatments.”
Size dependent predation risk in cryptic and conspicuous insects (2007, methodology): “The dependence of the rank and time of being found on colour and size was analysed with type III repeated measures ANOVA (SAS PROC MIXED, Littell et al. 2002), size being treated as a continuous variable.”
Mass selection for survival and resistance to OsHV-1 infection in Crassostrea gigas spat in field conditions: response to selection after four generations (2015, unknown): “This approach allows for a more powerful analysis than rerunning the model for each effect because the degrees of freedom are not reduced (Littell et al., 2002).”