'Complacent Car Addicts' or 'Aspiring Environmentalists'? Identifying travel behaviour segments using attitude theory

By Jillian Anable. 2005

1,088 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Transportation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fef11aec54268fe6d0b181c0b44438a2178a3658

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

In Transportation

Citations in the corpus

Exploring the Attitudes-Action Gap in Household Resource Consumption: Does “Environmental Lifestyle” Segmentation Align with Consumer Behaviour? (2013, background): “Other segmentations [27,29] have been developed for specific applications, such as:”
The travel behaviour intentions of young people in the context of climate change (2010, background): “In doing so, policy makers may be able to target specific policy measures at particular groups of people (see Anable 2005; Defra, 2008a).”
Why sustainable transport policies will fail: EU climate policy in the light of transport taboos (2014, background): “The situation is more complex for car driving, where better options exist to switch modes (see Anable, 2005; Schwanen and Lucas 2011).”
Is the intention to use public transport for different travel purposes determined by different factors (2016, background): “Most people are now highly dependent on car travel (Anable, 2005).”
Travellers’ profiles definition using statistical multivariate analysis of attitudinal variables (2011, methodology): “In fact, Stradling and Anable (2008) argue that environment characteristics or land use effects influence transport patterns and choices and, likewise, the location of trip origins (e.g. homes) and trip destinations such as jobs, shops and recreations can be shaped by the topography of the terrain. ”
Values, attitudes and travel behavior: a hierarchical latent variable mixed logit model of travel mode choice (2014, background): “The failure of policies attempting to achieve modal shifts has been ascribed by many researchers to an incomplete understanding of the cognitive process underlying the formation and persistence of individual preferences (Bamberg et al. 2003; Anable 2005; Steg 2005).”
From attitude to satisfaction: introducing the travel mode choice cycle (2021, positive): “Some directly inspired by the theory of planned behaviour (e.g. Anable, 2005; Bamberg et al., 2003a; Chen & Chao, 2011; Eriksson & Forward, 2011) have mostly con ﬁ rmed the theoretically posited in ﬂ uences of attitudes, subjective norm, and perceived behavioural control on intentions, and of…”
Transit market research using structural equation modeling and attitudinal market segmentation (2008, background): “Anable (2005) showed that attitude-based market segments were very useful in identifying potential ‘mode switchers,’ whereas socio-demographic factors had little bearing on the travel profiles of the segments; this suggests that attitudes largely cut across personal characteristics.”
Do people travel with their preferred travel mode? Analysing the extent of travel mode dissonance and its effect on travel satisfaction (2018, background): “Studies have shown that positive attitudes towards the environment discourage car use (Anable, 2005), while people with a positive 1 An attitude can be defined as the degree of a favourable or unfavourable evaluation or appraisal of a certain object, person or behaviour (definition based on Ajzen,…”